In the 2021 case Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta, the Supreme Court held:
A) California may not require charities soliciting contributions in the state to disclose the identity of their major donors.
B) The disclosure requirement unconstitutionally burdened donors' First Amendment rights and was not narrowly tailored.
C) Although it was convenient for the state to have donor information "close at hand," mere administrative convenience did not justify the burden on donors' rights.
D) Measures such as a subpoena offered a more tailored approach to investigating fraud.
E) All of the above.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q49: Super PACs:
A) must disclose contributions and expenditures
Q50: Broadcasters:
A) are liable for libel conveyed during
Q51: As a result of the Citizens United
Q52: Why did a federal judge vacate an
Q53: The Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA):
A) relies
Q55: What is the definition of the following
Q56: What is the definition of the following
Q57: What is the definition of the following
Q58: What is the definition of the following
Q59: What is the definition of the following
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents