The Universal Declaration on Human Rights did not impose legal obligations on states, but rather standards toward which they were expected to aspire as an 'intentionally unenforceable, self-consciously a mission statement for humanity'.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Universal Declaration on Human Rights was not binding in a legal sense, but was meant to serve as a moral guide for nations to uphold human rights. It was intentionally non-enforceable, and more of a statement of principles and aspirations for humanity.

The Universal Declaration on Human Rights Did Not Impose Legal