Judges who tend to interject their own values into their interpretations of the law are practicing:

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Judicial activism is when judges use their own values and beliefs to interpret the law and make decisions. This approach is seen as more liberal and interventionist, as judges may take a more proactive role in shaping policy and protecting individual rights. In contrast, judicial restraint involves deferring to the legislative and executive branches and interpreting the law narrowly, based on its original intent or strict construction.

Judges Who Tend to Interject Their Own Values into Their