In Hudson v. Michigan, the Court held the purpose of the "knock-and-announce" rule was to:
A) Prevent violence, property damage, and impositions on privacy
B) Prevent the police from conducting a search for which they had a valid warrant
C) Encourage the police to be polite and courteous to the public
D) Aid the police in gathering valuable evidence
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q8: The no-knock entry is reasonable if officers
Q9: The _ concerns the ability of law
Q10: Which of the following case law decisions
Q11: As decided in United States v. Banks,
Q12: A(n) _ warrant is a warrant issued
Q14: The Court recognizes that searches and seizures
Q15: A search is different from a seizure,
Q16: A search is limited to homes, buildings,
Q17: If the search yields items that may
Q18: Most seizures are made with a warrant.
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents