Why did the Supreme Court in Sitz decided in favor of the state?
A) The balance of the state's interest in preventing drunk driving
B) The extent to which sobriety checkpoints can reasonably be said to advance a state interest in preventing drunk driving
C) The minimal degree of intrusion upon individual motorists who are stopped briefly
D) All of the above
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: When did the practice of establishing roadblocks
Q2: In Michigan Department of State Police v.
Q4: Highway checkpoints whose primary purpose is _
Q5: In Illinois v. Lidster, the Court held
Q6: Which of the following types of roadblocks
Q7: The Court has held that sobriety checkpoints
Q8: The general rule in Fourth Amendment cases
Q9: Which of the following if not an
Q10: In _, the Court held that even
Q11: Roadblocks designed to detect "ordinary criminal wrongdoing"
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents