In Packingham V

In Packingham v. United States the Court ruled that to deprive access to social media altogether was unconstitutional. What was the basis for their decision?

A) Preventing people from accessing social media would bar a substantial amount of expression and thus a violation to First Amendment rights.
B) Laws should be written more broadly to represent the legitimate interests of the state.
C) Allowing access to social media would provide valuable incriminating information that could be used in court.
D) The Court recognized the difficulty of separating digital data from more traditional evidence.