In Berghuis v. Thompkins, the Court held that a suspect must make an unambiguous invocation of the right to remain silent; otherwise, statements made will be considered ________ and a waiver of the right.
A) Voluntary
B) Involuntary
C) Inadmissible in court
D) Reasonable

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In Berghuis v. Thompkins, the Supreme Court ruled that a suspect must clearly invoke their right to remain silent for it to be recognized. If they fail to do so unambiguously, any statements they make can be considered voluntary and thus a waiver of their right to silence.

In Berghuis V