One reason that N
uses the chariot example is to illustrate how
A) a whole is the sum collection of its parts.
B) a whole can be identified with its most essential parts.
C) there are no such things as wholes which exist over and above their parts.
D) it makes no sense at all to talk about chariots as existing in the first place.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q7: The Buddha thought that we have attachments
Q8: According to the Buddhist doctrine of impermanence,
A)
Q9: To refute the idea that there is
Q10: To explain how someone can experience the
Q11: When an enlightened person achieves the first
Q13: Having failed to identify N Q14: According to N Q15: One reason why a chariot cannot be Q16: Against the Buddhists, the Q17: The role of particularity ( Unlock this Answer For Free Now! View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()