The Chinese philosophical debates about logic and language are never far from political and moral concerns. They recognized the importance of being precise with words as well as, for the Daoists, inconsistency and vagueness of words. Bring in Chad Hansen's discussion on the philosophy of language in the Zhuangzi and the Laozi to facilitate comparison with early Wittgenstein and the logical positivists. Chad Hansen, A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought: A Philosophical Interpretation, Oxford University Press (1992). Alternatively, this is a good opportunity to discuss propaganda and rhetoric as ways to facilitate (or dissolve) moral and societal cohesion.
Correct Answer:
Answered by Quizplus AI
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q15: Explain the difference between nomos and physis,
Q16: Contrast Heraclitus and Sophocles' character Antigone, on
Q17: Characterize Socrates as he is portrayed in
Q18: What is Callicles' theory about the origin
Q19: How is the practice of rhetoric, as
Q20: Compare Heraclitus, who says that we are
Q21: Is it more important to be just
Q22: Facilitate discussion about the similarities and differences
Q23: The Zhuangzi can be used to problematize
Q25: Discussion of wúwéi benefits from the idea
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents