Contingency approaches to leadership are generally more powerful than universal approaches for defining the relationships of tasks and behaviors to effectiveness.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Contingency approaches to leadership recognize that the effectiveness of leadership styles varies with the context, making them more adaptable and often more powerful in explaining the complex relationship between leadership behavior, task requirements, and effectiveness, compared to universal approaches that suggest a one-size-fits-all model of leadership.

Contingency Approaches to Leadership Are Generally More Powerful Than Universal