The theory of judicial decision making that suggests judges sometimes vote against their own personal preferences in order to reach a compromise acceptable to other institutional actors is

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The strategic model of judicial decision making posits that judges, recognizing the constraints and preferences of other actors in the political and legal system, may sometimes vote in ways that do not align with their personal or ideological preferences. This approach is taken in order to achieve outcomes that are more broadly acceptable or to advance long-term strategic goals, such as maintaining the institution's legitimacy or fostering consensus.

The Theory of Judicial Decision Making That Suggests Judges Sometimes