In which Supreme Court case did the Court hold that Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) does not impermissibly advance religion by giving greater protection to religious rights than to other constitutionally protected rights?
A) Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith
B) Cutter v. Wilkinson
C) Holt v. Hobbs
D) Sherbert v. Verner

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Cutter v. Wilkinson is the case where the Supreme Court held that the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) does not impermissibly advance religion, despite giving greater protection to religious rights than to other constitutionally protected rights.

In Which Supreme Court Case Did the Court Hold That