According to Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole v. Scott, the federal exclusionary rule does not bar the introduction of evidence seized in violation of parolees' Fourth Amendment rights at parole revocation hearings.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole v. Scott, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the federal exclusionary rule does not apply to parole revocation hearings, meaning evidence seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment can be introduced at these hearings.

According to Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole V