The Supreme Court held that a statute that provided too limited a range of mitigating circumstances is constitutional.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Supreme Court has held that statutes which provide too limited a range of mitigating circumstances in death penalty cases are unconstitutional, as they may prevent the jury from considering aspects of the defendant's character or the circumstances of the crime that might warrant a less severe punishment. This principle was established to ensure that the death penalty is applied fairly and only in the most appropriate cases, in line with the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishments.

The Supreme Court Held That a Statute That Provided Too