Which is the best counterexample to the principle in the following Argument from Principle?
[Pay attention to the criteria for good counterexamples from Chapter 6 of Doing Practical Ethics.]
1) Physicians ought to do whatever procedure a patient has autonomously chosen.
2) Voluntarily-chosen euthanasia is an autonomously chosen procedure. So, a physician ought to do voluntarily-chosen euthanasia.
A) Some years ago in Germany, a man placed an ad in the newspaper asking for someone who would agree to be killed and eaten. Startlingly, someone agreed, and he went to visit the man and was killed and eaten. Suppose they had asked a i. doctor to help out by doing surgery to cut up the volunteer for easier eating. Should the doctor do this? No! The doctor should not do that, even if they were both autonomously choosing it.
B) Sometimes a doctor should clearly not do what the patient has autonomously chosen.
C) Suppose a patient wants to do a procedure that has a chance of saving their life but that has some potential risks. The doctor has explained all of the risks to the patient, and the patient seems to understand them. If the patient autonomously chooses this, then the doctor should clearly do the procedure.
D) Euthanasia is not always autonomously chosen, even if it's not coerced.

Question

Which is the best counterexample to the principle in the following Argument from Principle?
[Pay attention to the criteria for good counterexamples from Chapter 6 of Doing Practical Ethics.]
 1) Physicians ought to do whatever procedure a patient has autonomously chosen.
2) Voluntarily-chosen euthanasia is an autonomously chosen procedure. So, a physician ought to do voluntarily-chosen euthanasia.
A) Some years ago in Germany, a man placed an ad in the newspaper asking for someone who would agree to be killed and eaten. Startlingly, someone agreed, and he went to visit the man and was killed and eaten. Suppose they had asked a i. doctor to help out by doing surgery to cut up the volunteer for easier eating. Should the doctor do this? No! The doctor should not do that, even if they were both autonomously choosing it. 
B) Sometimes a doctor should clearly not do what the patient has autonomously chosen. 
C) Suppose a patient wants to do a procedure that has a chance of saving their life but that has some potential risks. The doctor has explained all of the risks to the patient, and the patient seems to understand them. If the patient autonomously chooses this, then the doctor should clearly do the procedure. 
D) Euthanasia is not always autonomously chosen, even if it's not coerced.

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of Which is the best counterexample to the principle in the following Argument from Principle?
[Pay attention to the criteria for good counterexamples from Chapter 6 of Doing Practical Ethics.]
 1) Physicians ought to do whatever procedure a patient has autonomously chosen.
2) Voluntarily-chosen euthanasia is an autonomously chosen procedure. So, a physician ought to do voluntarily-chosen euthanasia.
A) Some years ago in Germany, a man placed an ad in the newspaper asking for someone who would agree to be killed and eaten. Startlingly, someone agreed, and he went to visit the man and was killed and eaten. Suppose they had asked a i. doctor to help out by doing surgery to cut up the volunteer for easier eating. Should the doctor do this? No! The doctor should not do that, even if they were both autonomously choosing it. 
B) Sometimes a doctor should clearly not do what the patient has autonomously chosen. 
C) Suppose a patient wants to do a procedure that has a chance of saving their life but that has some potential risks. The doctor has explained all of the risks to the patient, and the patient seems to understand them. If the patient autonomously chooses this, then the doctor should clearly do the procedure. 
D) Euthanasia is not always autonomously chosen, even if it's not coerced.

Which Is the Best Counterexample to the Principle in the Following