A trucking company can act as a common carrier-for hire to the general public at published rates. As a common carrier, it is liable for any cargo damage, unless the company can show that it was not negligent. If the company can demonstrate that it was not negligent, then it is not liable for cargo damage. In contrast, a contract carrier (a trucking company hired by a shipper under a specific contract) is only responsible for cargo damage as spelled out in the contract. A Claus Inc. tractortrailer, acting under common carrier authority, was in a 5-vehicle accident that damaged its cargo. A Nichols Inc. tractor-trailer, acting under contract carrier authority, was involved in the same accident, and its cargo was also damaged.
A) If Claus Inc. is liable, then it can show that it was not negligent
B) If Claus Inc. cannot show that it was not negligent, then it is not liable
C) If Claus Inc. can show that it was not negligent, then it is not liable
D) If Nichols Inc. is liable, then it cannot show that it is negligent
E) If Nichols Inc. can show that it is not negligent, then it is not liable
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Often, crimes are characterized as either malum
Q3: A rapidly changing technical environment in government
Q4: Phyllis T. is a former Federal employee
Q5: Some 480,000 immigrants were living in a
Q6: Police officers were led to believe that
Q7: Impressions made by the ridges on the
Q8: Explosives are substances or devices capable of
Q9: The alphanumeric coding of a fingerprint is
Q10: The printed output of some computer-driven printers
Q11: Agent Y was asked to conduct a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents