Which of the following court cases held that strict scrutiny should be applied to those instances that restricted the democratic process?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The case of U.S. v. Carolene Products (1938) held that courts should apply strict scrutiny to laws that restrict political processes such as voting rights, as they are crucial to the functioning of a democratic society. This decision established the principle that laws that restrict access to the democratic process must be narrowly tailored to meet a compelling government interest, a higher standard than the usual rational basis test.

Which of the Following Court Cases Held That Strict Scrutiny