An application naming X and Y as joint inventors, filed on April 3, 2002, has a single pending claim, and does not claim the benefit of any earlier application. Which, if any, of the following items of prior art that have been relied on in various rejections of the claim may be overcome by a suitable affidavit under 37 CFR 1.131 in accordance with the patent laws, rules and procedures as related in the MPEP?
A) A U.S. patent to G that issued on March 27, 2001, has an effective U.S. filing date of January 4, 2000, and does not claim the "same patentable invention" (as defined in 37 CFR 1.601(n) ) as the rejected claim.
B) A U.S. patent to P that issued on June 5, 2001, has an effective U.S. filing date of February 1, 2000, and includes a claim that is identical to the rejected claim.
C) A journal article to H published on December 10, 2001, and characterized in the application as "describ[ing] the prior art."
D) A foreign patent issued to X and Y on November 7, 2001, which claims the same subject matter as the rejected claim and is based on an application filed on January 3, 2001.
E) None of the above.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q38: Which of the following best describes a
Q39: A patent application is filed disclosing and
Q40: Co-inventors Smith and Jones filed an application
Q41: Determine which of the following documents, if
Q42: In accordance with the patent laws, rules
Q44: A registered practitioner properly recorded an assignment
Q45: Applicant files a patent application in Japan
Q46: The primary examiner has rejected claims 1-10
Q47: In accordance with the patent laws, rules
Q48: A primary examiner is examining a patent
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents