In Lamson v. Crater Lake Motors, in which a car sales employee who felt that the sales tactics of the company were unethical and was fired after he refused to cooperate sued the company for wrongful discharge, the appeals court found that Lamson had no case because:
A) he was not explicitly or implicitly directed to participate in any unlawful activity
B) his actions were not an important public duty
C) the defendant took no action concerning the plaintiff that amounted to a tort under the applicable law
D) all of the other specific choices
E) none of the other specific choices
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q317: Some companies have employees take ethics classes
Q318: Morals refer to:
A) correct rules of conduct
Q319: Generally accepted rules of correct conduct within
Q320: How substantive law is enforced through the
Q321: In Lamson v. Crater Lake Motors, in
Q322: Corporate social responsibility, as written about by
Q324: Pressures to improve the ethical "climate" of
Q325: With respect to the relation between morality
Q326: Which one contributed to the push for
Q327: In his writings about "the ethics of
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents