The case Erie v. Tompkins, involving a man hit by a train in Pennsylvania, holds that federal courts must apply either state common law or state statutory law in resolving disputes between citizens of different states.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q104: In Erie v. Tompkins, where Tompkins was
Q105: Traditionally, in contracts cases, the conflict-of-law rule
Q106: The doctrine of forum non conveniens is
Q107: A suit involving a dispute for $45,000
Q108: Some states require that no matter what
Q110: Fact Pattern 2-1
Yoshi, a Japanese citizen working
Q111: A suit involving a dispute for $1
Q112: Courts often apply a "significant interest" test
Q113: A conflict-of-law arises when incidents occur that
Q114: In Erie v. Tompkins, where Tompkins was
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents