State courts may never have jurisdiction in which of the following situations?
A) plaintiff and defendant both live in the same state and the dispute involves state law
B) plaintiff and defendant live in different states, the matter involves state law, and the amount in controversy is less than $75,000
C) plaintiff and defendant live in different states, the matter involves state law, and the amount in controversy is more than $75,000
D) plaintiff and defendant live in the same state and the dispute involves a law for which the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction
E) none of the other choices; state courts could have jurisdiction in any of the situations
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q356: As the Supreme Court has explained, for
Q357: In rem jurisdiction gives state courts jurisdiction
Q358: A state court can exercise jurisdiction over
Q359: In Blimka v. My Web Wholesalers an
Q360: In rem jurisdiction would not be likely
Q362: Which of the following could be subject
Q363: Which of the following would NOT be
Q364: If a dispute may be resolved in
Q365: If a dispute may be resolved in
Q366: In this situation, which court system has
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents