Right of removal is intended to:
A) protect out-of-state plaintiffs from state courts that might favor their own citizens
B) protect out-of-state defendants from being disadvantaged by not understanding the state court system
C) protect out-of-state defendants from state courts that might favor their own citizens
D) protect a state's attorneys from competition from attorneys from other states
E) none of the other choices are correct
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q391: State courts often have jurisdiction to hear
Q392: A defendant may not remove a case
Q393: In a case involving state law that
Q394: In Erie Railroad v. Tompkins, where Tompkins
Q395: Concurrent jurisdiction is when the:
A) state and
Q397: Divorce, adoption, and other matters controlled by
Q398: Right of removal allows:
A) defendants to have
Q399: If either state courts or federal courts
Q400: In a case involving state law that
Q401: The general conflict-of-law rule for tort cases
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents