In Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, where Tompkins sued a New York company that owned a train that hit him in Pennsylvania:
A) the U.S. Supreme Court said that federal common law must be applied in federal court
B) the U.S. Supreme Court said that since this was a matter of common law involving two states, it was a matter for the state courts, not federal district court
C) the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania said this was a matter of New York common law that must be tried in federal court
D) the Supreme Court of New York said this was a matter of Pennsylvania common law that must be tried in that state
E) none of the other choices are correct
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q385: Right of removal allows:
A) defendants to have
Q386: Parties to a suit may prefer state
Q387: Concurrent jurisdiction is when the:
A) state trial
Q388: Right of removal is intended to:
A) keep
Q389: A plaintiff files suit in state court.
Q391: State courts often have jurisdiction to hear
Q392: A defendant may not remove a case
Q393: In a case involving state law that
Q394: In Erie Railroad v. Tompkins, where Tompkins
Q395: Concurrent jurisdiction is when the:
A) state and
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents