In Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, where Tompkins sued a New York company that owned a train that hit him in Pennsylvania, the Supreme Court held that:
A) federal common law did not exist in diversity-of-citizenship cases
B) federal courts would apply federal common law in diversity-of-citizenship cases
C) federal common law would be used when there was no diversity of citizenship
D) federal common law takes precedence over state common law in all instances
E) federal judges may order a case out of state court to "protect judicial integrity"
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q404: According to the Supreme Court in Erie
Q405: Proper venue has as its basis:
A) removal
Q406: Conflict-of-law problems may arise when:
A) a state
Q407: The general conflict-of-law rule for tort cases
Q408: When a dispute brought in a state
Q410: Conflict-of-law problems may arise when:
A) a state
Q411: Proper venue refers to:
A) the final place
Q412: Suppose an airplane crashes in Arkansas, injuring
Q413: Proper venue has as its basis:
A) removal
Q414: When a state court hears a case
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents