In Frensenius Medical Care Holdings v. Tucker, the appeals court held it did not violate equal protection to restrict physician ownership of certain medical facilities.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The sentence accurately reflects the ruling in Frensenius Medical Care Holdings v. Tucker. The appeals court found that the restriction on physician ownership was rationally related to the legitimate government interest of addressing potential conflicts of interest and improving patient health outcomes, and therefore did not violate equal protection.

In Frensenius Medical Care Holdings V