Wickard V Filburn Concerned the Ability of Congress to Impose Federal

Wickard v. Filburn concerned the ability of Congress to impose federal controls on wheat production, including a small farm that produced only 239 bushels of wheat, all for use on the farm. The Supreme Court held that the controls were:

A) unconstitutional since the matter agriculture is exempted from regulation
B) unconstitutional since such a small amount was "insufficient commerce," but the regulations could be written to apply to all active sellers in the wheat market
C) unconstitutional since all of the wheat was sold or used within the state
D) unconstitutional since none of the wheat was sold; all wheat was used on the farm
E) none of the other choices