Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona concerned whether Arizona could, for safety considerations, require trains traveling through the state be a shorter length than trains traveling through other states. The Supreme Court justified striking down the Arizona law because:
A) because the law did not concern a legitimate state interest to improve transportation safety
B) because Congress had passed legislation dealing with the length of trains
C) because the law conflicted with federal standards
D) because the law interfered with interstate commerce
E) none of the other choices
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q199: There are limits on Congressional power to
Q200: If Congress imposes a regulation on business,
Q201: States may not copy federal regulations if:
A)
Q202: Which of the following state statutes were
Q203: According to the Supreme Court, an Oklahoma
Q205: According to the Supreme Court, an Arizona
Q206: In Hughes v. Oklahoma, Oklahoma law forbid
Q207: In Hughes v. Oklahoma, Oklahoma law forbid
Q208: In Hughes v. Oklahoma, Oklahoma law forbid
Q209: In Hughes v. Oklahoma, Oklahoma law forbid
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents