In Marshall v. Barlow's, where the Occupational Safety and Health Administration asked the Supreme Court to require businesses to admit inspectors to conduct warrantless searches, the Supreme Court held that:
A) warrantless searches are generally unreasonable and that this rule applies to commercial premises as well as homes
B) warrantless searches are never unreasonable and that this rule applies to commercial premises as well as homes
C) warrantless searches are generally unreasonable, but that this rule does not apply to commercial premises
D) warrantless searches are always unreasonable, but that this rule does not apply to homes
E) none of the other choices are correct
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q336: The Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution
Q337: Despite the broad scope of the First
Q338: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to
Q339: The rule of law and the supremacy
Q340: Which of the following is a key
Q342: The Fifth Amendment protects individuals against:
A) self-incrimination
Q343: Based on the Fourth Amendment, the exclusionary
Q344: Improperly gather evidence:
A) is not allowed in
Q345: Individuals are protected from self-incrimination by:
A) the
Q346: In New York v. Burger, a junkyard
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents