The state of California told the owners of a beach-front house that, before it would issue a building permit to allow expansion of the house, the owners had to agree to allow public use of their beach property. The Supreme Court held that this:
A) was a proper use of state police power
B) was a proper use of state regulatory power for "the public welfare"
C) regulation of beach land was consistent with federal law and so was permissible
D) was an unjust taking of property without compensation
E) regulation was inconsistent with existing federal law and so was stricken
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q369: Fifth Amendment protection does not apply to:
A)
Q370: Eminent domain is when:
A) private corporations take
Q371: Under the Fifth Amendment, when can a
Q372: The Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution:
A)
Q373: "No person shall be...compelled in any criminal
Q375: Regulatory takings cases indicate that:
A) the destruction
Q376: Suppose the city changes the regulations concerning
Q377: The constitutional requirement that governments must give
Q378: "...nor shall private property be taken for
Q379: The traditional primary use of the Fifth
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents