In Squish La Fish v. Thomco Specialty Products, involving an adhesive that did not work as hoped in product packaging, Squish La Fish sued the adhesive seller for negligent misrepresentation because:
A) Squish La Fish could not use the adhesive because it was toxic
B) Thomco raised the price of the adhesive after Squish La Fish agreed to buy it
C) Squish La Fish felt that it relied on Thomco's false information about the adhesive and suffered economic losses as a result
D) all of the specific choices
E) none of the specific choices
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q186: Suppose a surgeon is sued for negligence
Q187: In Squish La Fish v. Thomco Specialty
Q188: The sine qua non rule is also
Q189: In a tort of negligence, causation is:
A)
Q190: The proximate cause of an injury is
Q192: In Squish La Fish v. Thomco Specialty
Q193: Suppose a surgeon is sued for negligence
Q194: For liability to be imposed when negligence
Q195: Cause in fact is established by:
A) evidence
Q196: The proximate cause of an injury is
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents