The sine qua non rule or but for rule is that:
A) the injury would not have occurred if the victim had known the tortfeasor
B) the injury would not have occurred but for the conduct of the tortfeasor
C) the injury is the fault of the tortfeasor
D) the injury occurred because of the tortfeasor's lack of knowledge
E) none of the other choices
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q176: With regard to torts, New Zealand differs
Q177: In Squish La Fish v. Thomco Specialty
Q178: The reasonable person standard compares the actions
Q179: Tort law makes every individual:
A) responsible for
Q180: Negligence torts differ from intentional torts in
Q182: In Squish La Fish v. Thomco Specialty
Q183: For liability to be imposed when negligence
Q184: The term res ipsa loquitur means:
A) an
Q185: Proximate cause limits liability to harms:
A) whether
Q186: Suppose a surgeon is sued for negligence
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents