In Geczi v. Lifetime Fitness, where Geczi suffered an injury when a treadmill at Lifetime malfunctioned but a jury held Lifetime not to be negligent, the appeals court held that Lifetime was not liable because:
A) Geczi expressly assumed the risk of injury
B) Geczi was over 18 when she signed the release of liability form
C) Geczi was a rational adult who should have understood the inherent risks of a treadmill
D) Geczi signed the release of liability form in front of witnesses
E) all of the other choices are correct
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q246: Under the doctrine of _, damages are
Q247: There are several key elements needed to
Q248: Express assumption of risk is when:
A) the
Q249: In Wassell v. Adams the plaintiff was
Q250: In Wassell v. Adams the plaintiff was
Q252: In Geczi v. Lifetime Fitness, where Geczi
Q253: If a jury finds there is comparative
Q254: If a jury finds there is comparative
Q255: Intentional torts:
A) are determined by state statute
B)
Q256: The doctrine of _ permits damages to
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents