In Lawler v. Montblanc North America, where Lawler, a store manager, was fired after telling her employer that she could not work more than 20 hours a week due to a medical condition, she sued for emotional distress and the appeals court held that:
A) she had no claim for emotional distress, but may have one for assault because of the fear she felt
B) she had no claim for emotional distress because the situation was upsetting, not outrageous
C) she had a claim for emotional distress as her expert witness testified that the situation likely triggered a severe mental response
D) she had a claim for emotional distress, as her expert witness testified that the behavior of her supervisor was outrageous and "beyond the bounds of decency"
E) none of the other choices are correct
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q352: Carl's neighbor writes a column for the
Q353: One concept behind the tort of invasion
Q354: Which of the following would be least
Q355: Which of the following would be an
Q356: The concept behind the tort of invasion
Q358: Carl's neighbor writes a column for the
Q359: Which of the following would be least
Q360: Entertainers, politicians and sports personalities differ from
Q361: The three privileges that may be used
Q362: Which of the following is (are) necessary
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents