In Chambers v. Travelers Companies, where Chambers sued for defamation after she was fired for her behavior, which included failure to reveal certain information about a business trip, but the district court held for Travelers, the appeals court found that:

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The appeals court found that Chambers did not have a case because Travelers had a qualified privilege that it did not abuse. The court held that the statements made by Travelers were made in good faith and based on a legitimate business concern, and thus were protected by a qualified privilege. Chambers did not provide any evidence that Travelers had abused this privilege.

In Chambers V