In Gieseke v. IDCA, Gieseke formed a company to compete with his old employer and worked with one of the former owners of his old employer in the new company. His former employer moved some of the equipment of the new company and changed its mailing address without permission of Gieseke or his partner. When Gieseke sued, the courts held that the former employer acted properly to recover property and information improperly taken by Gieseke..

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The statement is incorrect. In Gieseke v. IDCA, the courts held that the former employer acted improperly by moving equipment and changing the mailing address without permission, and awarded damages to Gieseke and his partner.

In Gieseke V