In Gieseke v. IDCA, Gieseke formed a company to compete with his old employer and worked with one of the former owners of his old employer in the new company. His former employer moved some of the equipment of the new company and changed its mailing address without permission of Gieseke or his partner. When Gieseke sued, the courts held that the former employer had interfered with prospective business relations.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The courts held that the former employer had interfered with prospective business relations, as described in the scenario.

In Gieseke V