In the 1913 case Mazetti v. Armour, the court held that privity of contract had to be proved before a plaintiff could sue a food company for breach of warranty in a product defect case.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The 1913 case Mazetti v. Armour was significant because it held that privity of contract was not necessary for a plaintiff to sue a food company for breach of warranty in a product defect case, marking a shift in consumer protection law.

In the 1913 Case Mazetti V