In Parish v. ICON, where a man was seriously injured when using a trampoline, the courts held that the product was inherently defective because of the high rate of injury.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In Parish v. ICON, the court did not hold that the product was inherently defective due to the high rate of injury. Instead, the court focused on whether the warnings provided with the trampoline were adequate and whether the plaintiff had assumed the risk of injury by using the product in a manner contrary to those warnings.

In Parish V