In Gieseke V

In Gieseke v. IDCA, Gieseke formed a company to compete with his old employer and worked with one of the former owners of his old employer in the new company. His former employer moved some of the equipment of the new company and changed its mailing address without permission of Gieseke or his partner. When Gieseke sued his former employer the courts held that he had a good cause of action for:

A) was not liable as it had no obligation to write policies
B) was not liable as it was prohibited by the state from doing insurance business any longer
C) was liable as it prohibited MDM from continuing its relationships with clients
D) was liable as it induced MDM to develop business relationships that were suddenly cancelled
E) none of the other choices