"No Gordo" is a common artificial sweetener. Researchers find it is responsible for cancer of the liver in some people. A person with liver cancer, who has eaten products containing "No Gordo" for years, wants to sue manufacturers who used the sweetener. In this case:
A) there is no one to sue since "No Gordo" is not patented and is used in many products
B) there is an assumption of the risk by consumers of such chemical products, so there is no liability
C) he may sue in strict liability for unknown hazards against all makers of "No Gordo"
D) there may be a suit in negligence against all makers of "No Gordo" for failure to adequately test the product
E) there may be a suit for intentional liability under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q348: While sitting beside a swimming pool, a
Q349: While sitting beside a swimming pool, a
Q350: Retired pesticide workers develop brain tumors. Evidence
Q351: Green bought a scoop attachment for the
Q352: HMA, operator of a hospital, contracted with
Q354: Worden entered into an agreement that allowed
Q355: A company packages poisoned wheat to use
Q356: Flush-O, a toilet cleaner, states clearly on
Q357: Worden entered into an agreement that allowed
Q358: E Corp. sold five million toasters. The
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents