In Erichsen v. No-Frills Supermarkets, a woman who was shopping was seriously injured by a robber in the parking lot. She sued the store claiming that its failure to provide adequate security was a breach of its duty to her. The Nebraska high court held that the store could:
A) be sued for negligence
B) be sued for strict liability for failure to protect a patron
C) have been liable if the incident occurred in the store, but not out in the parking lot
D) not be liable as the incident was a random, uncommon event
E) none of the other choices
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q273: You go to a flea market and
Q274: Property owners have:
A) a duty to inspect
Q275: Which of the following is an intentional
Q276: In Erichsen v. No-Frills Supermarkets, a woman
Q277: In Stewart v. Federated Department Stores, a
Q279: _ is the tort that occurs when
Q280: _ is the tort that occurs when
Q281: Fact Pattern 8-1
Jill recently inherited money from
Q282: Fact Pattern 8-1
Jill recently inherited money from
Q283: Fact Pattern 8-1
Jill recently inherited money from
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents