Solved

In Erichsen V

Question 268

Multiple Choice

In Erichsen v. No-Frills Supermarkets, a woman who was shopping was seriously injured by a robber in the parking lot. She sued the store claiming that its failure to provide adequate security was a breach of its duty to her. The Nebraska high court held that:


A) the store could be sued for negligence because there was a sufficient amount of criminal activity in the area to warrant warning customers
B) the store could not be sued for negligence because there was a sufficient amount of criminal activity in the area to warrant warning customers
C) the store could not be sued for negligence because there was not a sufficient amount of criminal activity in the area to warrant warning customers
D) the store could not be sued for negligence because Erichsen had a duty to protect herself
E) the store could not be sued for negligence because the high crime in the area was common knowledge

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions

Unlock this Answer For Free Now!

View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions

qr-code

Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks

upload documents

Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents