In Erichsen v. No-Frills Supermarkets, a woman who was shopping was seriously injured by a robber in the parking lot. She sued the store claiming that its failure to provide adequate security was a breach of its duty to her. The Nebraska high court held that:
A) the store could be sued for negligence because there was a sufficient amount of criminal activity in the area to warrant warning customers
B) the store could not be sued for negligence because there was a sufficient amount of criminal activity in the area to warrant warning customers
C) the store could not be sued for negligence because there was not a sufficient amount of criminal activity in the area to warrant warning customers
D) the store could not be sued for negligence because Erichsen had a duty to protect herself
E) the store could not be sued for negligence because the high crime in the area was common knowledge
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q263: In cases involving businesses, where the public
Q264: Fact Pattern 8-1
Jill recently inherited money from
Q265: Troupe was shopping at a Burlington Coat
Q266: If a danger is obvious:
A) people have
Q267: You go to a flea market and
Q269: When intellectual property, such as copyrights, patents,
Q270: In Stewart v. Federated Department Stores, a
Q271: In Erichsen v. No-Frills Supermarkets, a woman
Q272: Troupe was shopping at a Burlington Coat
Q273: You go to a flea market and
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents