In Audi AG v. D'Amato, where Audi sued D'Amato for trademark violations for selling Audi logo goods on his website audisport.com, D'Amato claimed that there could not be any consumer confusion because he had a disclaimer on his website. The appeals court held that:
A) a disclaimer does not absolve D'Amato of liability for his unlawful use of marks identical to Audi's trademarks
B) a disclaimer absolves D'Amato of liability for his unlawful use of marks identical to Audi's trademarks
C) the disclaimer would have absolved D'Amato of liability if it had been in more languages
D) the disclaimer would have absolved D'Amato of liability if it had been longer
E) the disclaimer was not legitimate because it was written by D'Amato and not by an attorney
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q258: Adidas is a famous trademark. If another
Q259: Which of the following is a defense
Q260: Adidas is a famous trademark. If another
Q261: Trade dress refers to:
A) a company's dress
Q262: In Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana,
Q264: A commercial symbol that concerns the "look
Q265: Counterfeit goods:
A) may be seized and destroyed
B)
Q266: A commercial symbol that concerns the "look
Q267: In Audi AG v. D'Amato, where Audi
Q268: If people are told that counterfeit goods
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents