In Audi AG v. D'Amato, where Audi sued D'Amato for trademark violations for selling Audi logo goods on his website audisport.com, D'Amato claimed that there could not be any consumer confusion because he had a disclaimer on his website. The appeals court held that:
A) the disclaimer was not legitimate because it was written by D'Amato and not by an attorney
B) a disclaimer absolves D'Amato of liability for his unlawful use of marks identical to Audi's trademarks
C) the disclaimer would have absolved D'Amato of liability if it had been in more languages
D) the disclaimer would have absolved D'Amato of liability if it had been longer
E) none of the other choices are correct
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q266: A commercial symbol that concerns the "look
Q267: In Audi AG v. D'Amato, where Audi
Q268: If people are told that counterfeit goods
Q269: In Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana,
Q270: "Inherently distinctive" trade dress is protected under
Q272: "Inherently distinctive" trade dress is protected under
Q273: The owners of trademarks often know there
Q274: Which of the following statements is not
Q275: Trade dress refers to:
A) a commercial symbol
Q276: Counterfeit goods:
A) may be sold with Trademark
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents