Chevaldina had a business dispute with Katz, a well-known real estate tycoon. Chevaldina had a blog devoted to criticizing Katz's business practices. She found an unflattering photo of Katz and posted it on the blog. Katz then obtained a copyright on the photo and sued Chevaldina for copyright infringement for publishing the photo on the blog without permission. The appeals court held that Katz had:
A) no case; posting the photo on the blog was fair use.
B) no case because the photo was posted on the blog before he obtained the copyright; prior publication is protected.
C) a strong case for copyright infringement because he notified Chevaldina of the copyright and gave a reasonable amount of time for the protected photo to be removed.
D) a clear case of copyright infringement as Chevaldina knew the photo was used without permission.
E) none of the other choices are correct.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q396: Which of the following is true of
Q397: In Bohnsack v. Varco, inventor Bohnsack discussed
Q398: Intellectual property protection around the world is
Q399: Information that is not known by the
Q400: Which of the following can be patented
Q402: Jin worked on technical developments for Motorola.
Q403: Suppose a company steals a commercial trade
Q404: Under the _ "whoever, with intent to
Q405: Jin worked on technical developments for Motorola.
Q406: Chevaldina had a business dispute with Katz,
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents