QD Representatives Met with EDS Managers

QD representatives met with EDS managers. They discussed plans for a conference room with Persian carpets, quality furniture, and nice art. The parties agreed that the job would be done for $100,000, the final bill to be subject to review. QD delivered a room with ordinary carpet and furniture and posters of dogs. They sent a bill for $85,000. EDS sues QD:

A) EDS should win based on the UCC's perfect tender rule
B) EDS should win based on the UCC's provisions providing express and implied warranties of quality and merchantability
C) QD should win because the terms of the contract were vague, based on oral discussions, and the price was cut
D) QC should win on the basis of the seller's right to cure defects
E) QD should win on the basis of contract law because the UCC does not apply to real estate dealings