In Lee v. R&K Marine, where a boat that Lee bought became unusable after only three years when it fell apart, and the seller had expressly disclaimed all warranties, the court held:
A) Lee had no case because all the warranties on the boat expired after 2 years
B) Lee had no case because boats are one of the types of goods not covered by warranties
C) Lee had no case because the retailer's disclaimer met all the UCC requirements
D) Lee had a case because the retailer's disclaimer did not meet all the UCC requirements
E) Lee had a case because the defective boat endangered his life
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q350: UCC's damage measures are designed to put
Q351: The UCC's definition of "conspicuous" for a
Q352: Which of the following is a way
Q353: In Lee v. R&K Marine, where a
Q354: With respect to warranty disclaimers, under the
Q356: After a breach of contract by a
Q357: The UCC's remedies for breaches of contract
Q358: A disclaimer of an implied warranty is
Q359: In Lee v. R&K Marine, where a
Q360: With respect to warranty disclaimers, under the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents