Solved

In Storetrax

Question 339

Multiple Choice

In Storetrax.com v. Gurland, where Gurland, the founder of Storetrax.com, was removed as president but denied severance pay and sued for that, the appeals court held that he was:


A) not due severance pay because he was a board member and that was a conflict of interest
B) not due severance pay because he breached his obligation to the company while an officer and board member so lost the right to such compensation
C) due the severance pay promised because there was no conflict of interest in his role as a board member and his compensation
D) due severance pay promised as other members of the board breached their obligation to follow the bylaws of the company, so they could be personally liable to Gurland
E) none of the other choices

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions

Unlock this Answer For Free Now!

View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions

qr-code

Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks

upload documents

Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents