In Storetrax.com v. Gurland, where Gurland, the founder of Storetrax.com, was removed as president but denied severance pay and sued for that, the appeals court held that he was:
A) not due severance pay because he was a board member and that was a conflict of interest
B) not due severance pay because he breached his obligation to the company while an officer and board member so lost the right to such compensation
C) due severance pay promised as other members of the board breached their duties and so would be removed from the board in favor of control being vested in Gurland
D) due severance pay promised as other members of the board breached their obligation to follow the bylaws of the company, so they could be personally liable to Gurland
E) none of the other choices
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q348: Dissolution of a corporation:
A) may be voluntary
Q349: In Storetrax.com v. Gurland, where Gurland, the
Q350: The termination of a corporation:
A) is conducted
Q351: A corporation's board of directors hires _
Q352: In Storetrax.com v. Gurland, where Gurland, the
Q354: A(n) _ of a corporation involves approval
Q355: The process of settling the accounts and
Q356: A limited liability company:
A) is chartered by
Q357: There are two types of dissolution of
Q358: A limited liability company:
A) is taxed like
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents