In Bearden V

In Bearden v. Wardley Corp., where Bearden sued Wardley because one of its agents, Gritton, bought a house from her and then cheated her on the transaction, the court held that:

A) both Wardley and Gritton owed Bearden fiduciary duties and so both were liable
B) neither Wardley nor Gritton owed Bearden fiduciary duties and so neither was liable
C) only Wardley owed Bearden fiduciary duties and so only Warden was liable
D) only Gritton owed Bearden fiduciary duties and so only Gritton was liable
E) none of the other choices are correct